Excerpt from The New York Times: (click for entire article)
“In divorced families,” the family therapist Ruth Bettelheim wrote in The Times Sunday Review, “whose needs count for more: those of parents or those of children?”
The current system of creating custody and parenting plans during a divorce, she argues, tends — in spite of the “best interests of the child” standard — to favor parental need for finality over the child’s need for flexibility. “In reality, a custody agreement that meets the needs of a toddler is unlikely to be right for a teenager,” she writes.
Imagine yourself as a 13-year-old who wants to spend more time with your friends over the weekends. Unfortunately, your parents are divorced, and you spend weekends with a parent who lives two hours away. You would be unlikely to request a change in custody because it would mean altering a longstanding agreement and plunging into a morass of conflicting loyalties and guilt over betraying whichever parent would lose out. Faced with such dilemmas, children in divorced families frequently end up suppressing their own needs to reduce conflict with, or between, their parents. Even when children are driven to speak up and request custody modifications, their voices carry little, if any, legal weight.
Recent Comments