Excerpt from: The Jewish Week (click for full article)
As a person who has met life with a significant level of cerebral
palsy, and as a lover of words and their nuances, I have, throughout my
life, tracked the nomenclature that has been applied to those of us who
don’t quite fit into established physical, intellectual, communication,
sensory, psychological or social "norms."
Admittedly, we haven’t yet come up with a word to identify our
population that pleases nearly everyone. We are a diverse group. That
said, the term "disability" is the term that was thoughtfully chosen by
people with the full spectrum of obvious or hidden disabilities to be
used in civil rights and other legislation, such as the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA).
However, by not embracing the term "disability," and by embracing the
phrase “special needs”, we inadvertently legitimize and allow for the
expansion of the lingering stigma around having or being perceived as
having a disability. If we’re embarrassed by having a disability, why
should others have high regard for us? Furthermore, by opting to refer
to ourselves, our children, and our program participants as "special
needs populations," we become known specifically for our needs and the
specialness of our needs. Once again, our neediness, in particular, is
showcased and we are identified solely by our imagined limitless needs.
This phenomenon feeds right back into the common assumption that people
with disabilities are high maintenance. In fact, some people with
disabilities or people considered to have disabilities may have very few
or no needs for accommodation.
Recent Comments